STATE vs RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE — 2300/2015
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 14/57,19/54. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 04th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBM090002622015
Filing Number
2300/2015
Filing Date
04-12-2015
Registration No
2300/2015
Registration Date
04-12-2015
Court
JM-Chohtan
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-05-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts