STATE vs RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE — 2300/2015

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 14/57,19/54. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBM090002622015

Filing Number

2300/2015

Filing Date

04-Dec-2015

Registration No

2300/2015

Registration Date

04-Dec-2015

Court

JM-Chohtan

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 14/57,19/54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  6. 01-May-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 13-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 20-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 02-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 15-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 29-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 10-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 05-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 27-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 27-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 07-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 16-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 10-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 06-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 04-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 17-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 08-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 07-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 30-Sep-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 06-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 18-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 27-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 04-Dec-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2300/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case