STATE vs RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE — 2300/2015

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 14/57,19/54. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 04th May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBM090002622015

Case disposed

Filing Number

2300/2015

Filing Date

04-12-2015

Registration No

2300/2015

Registration Date

04-12-2015

Court

JM-Chohtan

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 14/57,19/54

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

RAMESH Advocate - UDAYABHAN SINGH RATHORE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

04-05-2026

Disposed

01-05-2026

Prosecution Evidence

21-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

30-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Judgment
04-05-2026
Judgment
04-05-2026
Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chohtan (Barmer District) convicted Ramesh Kumar (age 40) under Sections 14/57 and 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegally possessing 25 bottles of English alcohol without valid permit. The court found him guilty based on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports confirming the seized bottles contained illicit alcohol intended only for sale in Haryana. However, considering this was his first offense and mitigating circumstances, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of immediate imprisonment, requiring him to maintain good conduct for two years and deposit a personal bond of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM-Chohtan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case