RAMSINGH vs MUKESH KUMAR ETC — 50/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o 39 r 1&2. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 27th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBM010020302024
Filing Number
428/2024
Filing Date
19-10-2024
Registration No
50/2024
Registration Date
19-10-2024
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMSINGH
Adv. MUKESH JAIN
Respondent(s)
MUKESH KUMAR ETC
GAURAV VAISHNAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Barmer, Rajasthan granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out any construction work on the plaintiff's disputed property (marked plots ABCLD and VRVD in Khsara 3150/1585). The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case of ownership through ancestral property records and inheritance, with defendants unlawfully attempting construction without legal authority. The order maintains the property's current status until final judgment in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Barmer, Rajasthan granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out any construction work on the plaintiff's disputed property (marked plots ABCLD and VRVD in Khsara 3150/1585). The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case of ownership through ancestral property records and inheritance, with defendants unlawfully attempting construction without legal authority. The order maintains the property's current status until final judgment in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts