KISHNARAM ETC vs DEDARAM ETC Advocate - PREM KUMAR PRAJAPAT — 48/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 39 R 1 & 2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJBM010017512025

Filing Number

389/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed otherwise

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 39 R 1 & 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHNARAM ETC

    Adv. HARISH SONI

  2. 2.GULAB

  3. 3.champa

  4. 4.mumal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEDARAM ETC Advocate - PREM KUMAR PRAJAPAT

  2. 2.mota

  3. 3.nakhta ke kayam mukam virmaram

  4. 4.chunaram

  5. 5.ganga devi

  6. 6.nathu

  7. 7.smt antari devi

  8. 8.dhudi devi

  9. 9.up panjiyak vishala

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The District Judge of Barmer (Rajasthan) partially granted the petitioner Kishanaram's request for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. The court held that the disputed agricultural land is the ancestral property of the petitioner and respondents 1-5, and the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for maintaining the status quo of the land record until the main case is decided. The court ordered that the respondents shall maintain the land record in its original state and shall not create further complications regarding the property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 08-May-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  16. 20-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  17. 20-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  19. 02-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  20. 25-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  21. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  22. 01-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  23. 15-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Barmer (Rajasthan) partially granted the petitioner Kishanaram's request for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. The court held that the disputed agricultural land is the ancestral property of the petitioner and respondents 1-5, and the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for maintaining the status quo of the land record until the main case is decided. The court ordered that the respondents shall maintain the land record in its original state and shall not create further complications regarding the property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case