KISHNARAM ETC vs DEDARAM ETC Advocate - PREM KUMAR PRAJAPAT — 48/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 39 R 1 & 2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 11th May 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBM010017512025
Filing Number
389/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
48/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
3-District Judge
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHNARAM ETC
Adv. HARISH SONI
GULAB
champa
mumal
Respondent(s)
DEDARAM ETC Advocate - PREM KUMAR PRAJAPAT
mota
nakhta ke kayam mukam virmaram
chunaram
ganga devi
nathu
smt antari devi
dhudi devi
up panjiyak vishala
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 25-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge of Barmer (Rajasthan) partially granted the petitioner Kishanaram's request for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. The court held that the disputed agricultural land is the ancestral property of the petitioner and respondents 1-5, and the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for maintaining the status quo of the land record until the main case is decided. The court ordered that the respondents shall maintain the land record in its original state and shall not create further complications regarding the property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judge of Barmer (Rajasthan) partially granted the petitioner Kishanaram's request for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. The court held that the disputed agricultural land is the ancestral property of the petitioner and respondents 1-5, and the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for maintaining the status quo of the land record until the main case is decided. The court ordered that the respondents shall maintain the land record in its original state and shall not create further complications regarding the property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts