RAJURAM vs SMT PREMI — 52/2025
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section custody. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise on 28th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Non connected (38) - CIVIL MISC (NC)
CNR: RJBM010016762025
Filing Number
377/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
52/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJURAM
Adv. BHAJAN LAL VISHNOI
Respondent(s)
SMT PREMI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 05-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge (Barmer, Rajasthan) rejected the petitioner's application under Section 7 of the Guardianship and Wards Act seeking urgent custody of his two minor daughters. The court found that while the children are currently with their mother (respondent), they are in a secure environment receiving proper education and care, and that keeping them with their mother is in their best interest until they reach adulthood. The court declined to grant interim custody to the petitioner, dismissing the application as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge (Barmer, Rajasthan) rejected the petitioner's application under Section 7 of the Guardianship and Wards Act seeking urgent custody of his two minor daughters. The court found that while the children are currently with their mother (respondent), they are in a secure environment receiving proper education and care, and that keeping them with their mother is in their best interest until they reach adulthood. The court declined to grant interim custody to the petitioner, dismissing the application as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts