VIKRAM KUMAR MAHESHWARI vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 45/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJBM010015732025

Filing Number

1226/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed otherwise

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM KUMAR MAHESHWARI

    Adv. RAMESH SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

  2. 2.STUTI ENTERPRISES JARIYE RAJNI CHANNALAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the petition and ordered the release of ₹7,22,679 to petitioner Vikram Kumar from respondent Rajni Chunnalal's frozen bank account, finding that the funds were legitimately obtained through export incentive credits under the government's export promotion scheme and should not have been frozen. The court noted that the respondent (Rajni) had given consent to release the funds, and since other beneficiaries had already received their portions in similar circumstances, denying the petitioner's claim would be inequitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  15. 09-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  16. 17-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  17. 05-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  18. 27-Nov-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District Judge

  19. 20-Nov-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District Judge

  20. 11-Nov-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District Judge

  21. 16-Oct-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District Judge

  22. 14-Oct-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District Judge

  23. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petition and ordered the release of ₹7,22,679 to petitioner Vikram Kumar from respondent Rajni Chunnalal's frozen bank account, finding that the funds were legitimately obtained through export incentive credits under the government's export promotion scheme and should not have been frozen. The court noted that the respondent (Rajni) had given consent to release the funds, and since other beneficiaries had already received their portions in similar circumstances, denying the petitioner's claim would be inequitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case