KISANSINGH ETC vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 173/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBM010006092026

Filing Number

515/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

SHEO POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISANSINGH ETC

    Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA

  2. 2.RUGNATHSINGH

    Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA

  3. 3.BHOMSINGH

    Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Badmer Session Court (Rajasthan) granted bail to six accused persons in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 308(2), 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 140(3), 109(1), and 111(2)(b). The court found that the accused were not previously convicted, there was no prima facie evidence of life imprisonment or capital punishment, and the investigation was at an early stage, making bail appropriate at this juncture subject to furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties of similar amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Badmer Session Court (Rajasthan) granted bail to six accused persons in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 308(2), 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 140(3), 109(1), and 111(2)(b). The court found that the accused were not previously convicted, there was no prima facie evidence of life imprisonment or capital punishment, and the investigation was at an early stage, making bail appropriate at this juncture subject to furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties of similar amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case