RAWALSINGH ETC vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBM010006082026
Filing Number
514/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
3-District Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
SHEO POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAWALSINGH ETC
Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA
RUPARAM
Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA
PRATAPARAM
Adv. MAHENDARA SINGH SODHA
Respondent(s)
STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Bhadmer, Rajasthan granted bail to six accused persons (Ravalsingh, Rupaaram, Pratapaaram, Kishansingh, Rugnathsingh, and Bhomsingh) in FIR No. 55/2026 under IPC sections 308(2), 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 140(3), 109(1), and 111(2)(b). The court found that the charges involve a serious criminal gang involved in company site robberies, but no prior criminal records existed and investigation time was required. The court approved their bail on condition of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds, directing regular court appearance during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Bhadmer, Rajasthan granted bail to six accused persons (Ravalsingh, Rupaaram, Pratapaaram, Kishansingh, Rugnathsingh, and Bhomsingh) in FIR No. 55/2026 under IPC sections 308(2), 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 140(3), 109(1), and 111(2)(b). The court found that the charges involve a serious criminal gang involved in company site robberies, but no prior criminal records existed and investigation time was required. The court approved their bail on condition of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds, directing regular court appearance during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts