AJIJ KHA vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 171/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBM010006072026

Filing Number

513/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

DHORIMANNA POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIJ KHA

    Adv. RAJESH VISHNOI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Barmer (Rajasthan) granted bail to the accused Azeez Khan under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110, 324(4), and 307 (relating to a violent assault resulting in serious injuries). The court found no prior criminal record against the accused, no investigation delays, and that the case was still under investigation, making bail appropriate at this stage. The bail was conditioned on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a surety of ₹50,000 and regular appearance before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Barmer (Rajasthan) granted bail to the accused Azeez Khan under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110, 324(4), and 307 (relating to a violent assault resulting in serious injuries). The court found no prior criminal record against the accused, no investigation delays, and that the case was still under investigation, making bail appropriate at this stage. The bail was conditioned on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a surety of ₹50,000 and regular appearance before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case