BHAWANI SINGH vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 166/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBM010005882026
Filing Number
503/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
166/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
3-District Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
327
Police Station
POLICE STATION ,SADAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAWANI SINGH
Adv. VISHNU BHAGWAN LEGHA
Respondent(s)
STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Session Court of Bademaru granted bail to accused Bhawanisingh under Section 483 of the CrPC, noting that the charges under IPC Sections 331(6), 351(3), and 324(2)(6) do not carry life imprisonment or death penalty, and the accused has no prior criminal history. The court found the case suitable for bail on the basis of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and surety of equal amount, considering the case is at the evidence stage with substantial trial time remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Session Court of Bademaru granted bail to accused Bhawanisingh under Section 483 of the CrPC, noting that the charges under IPC Sections 331(6), 351(3), and 324(2)(6) do not carry life imprisonment or death penalty, and the accused has no prior criminal history. The court found the case suitable for bail on the basis of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and surety of equal amount, considering the case is at the evidence stage with substantial trial time remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts