DEVARAM vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 165/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBM010005872026

Filing Number

502/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

POLICE STATION ,SADAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVARAM

    Adv. MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Session Court in Badmer, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Devaram in a theft case (FIR No. 38/2026) registered under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305, involving stolen jewelry and cash worth approximately ₹1,07,000. The court found that the charges are cognizable offenses under magistrate jurisdiction, the accused has no prior criminal conviction, investigation is ongoing, and there is no apprehension of flight; therefore, bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 surety and ₹50,000 personal bond with the requirement to appear regularly before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Session Court in Badmer, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Devaram in a theft case (FIR No. 38/2026) registered under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305, involving stolen jewelry and cash worth approximately ₹1,07,000. The court found that the charges are cognizable offenses under magistrate jurisdiction, the accused has no prior criminal conviction, investigation is ongoing, and there is no apprehension of flight; therefore, bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 surety and ₹50,000 personal bond with the requirement to appear regularly before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case