DEVARAM vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBM010005872026
Filing Number
502/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ
Judge
3-District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
POLICE STATION ,SADAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVARAM
Adv. MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Session Court in Badmer, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Devaram in a theft case (FIR No. 38/2026) registered under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305, involving stolen jewelry and cash worth approximately ₹1,07,000. The court found that the charges are cognizable offenses under magistrate jurisdiction, the accused has no prior criminal conviction, investigation is ongoing, and there is no apprehension of flight; therefore, bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 surety and ₹50,000 personal bond with the requirement to appear regularly before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Session Court in Badmer, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Devaram in a theft case (FIR No. 38/2026) registered under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305, involving stolen jewelry and cash worth approximately ₹1,07,000. The court found that the charges are cognizable offenses under magistrate jurisdiction, the accused has no prior criminal conviction, investigation is ongoing, and there is no apprehension of flight; therefore, bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 surety and ₹50,000 personal bond with the requirement to appear regularly before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts