MAGHSINGH ETC vs SANT RAM KISHOR Advocate - AMRIT JAIN — 10/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section APPINU/S96CPC. Disposed: Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection dismissed on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil App. Decree - CIVIL APPEAL DECREE

CNR: RJBM010004722015

Filing Number

373/2015

Filing Date

08-Jul-2015

Registration No

10/2015

Registration Date

08-Jul-2015

Court

DJ ADJ-Barmer District HQ

Judge

3-District Judge

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection dismissed

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section APPINU/S96CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAGHSINGH ETC

    Adv. MUKESH JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANT RAM KISHOR Advocate - AMRIT JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Badmer District Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by Meghsingh and Varishal Singh against the lower court's 2015 decision upholding a temple trust's property rights. The court held that the disputed property belongs to the Rambagh Trust dedicated to Lord Nrsingh, not to the appellants, and that the plaintiff (Sant Ramkishor Das) had authority to file the suit as the trust's representative to protect trust property from unauthorized occupation by the appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  15. 20-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  17. 14-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  18. 06-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  19. 17-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  20. 17-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  21. 17-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  22. 10-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  23. 10-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  24. 02-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  25. 02-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  26. 25-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  27. 25-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  28. 20-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  29. 20-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  30. 17-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  31. 17-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  32. 10-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  33. 06-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  34. 06-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  35. 31-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  36. 16-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  37. 13-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  38. 13-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  39. 09-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  40. 09-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  41. 07-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  42. 07-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District Judge

  43. 20-Jul-2018

    Restored

  44. 26-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 08-Jul-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Badmer District Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by Meghsingh and Varishal Singh against the lower court's 2015 decision upholding a temple trust's property rights. The court held that the disputed property belongs to the Rambagh Trust dedicated to Lord Nrsingh, not to the appellants, and that the plaintiff (Sant Ramkishor Das) had authority to file the suit as the trust's representative to protect trust property from unauthorized occupation by the appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case