Mahaveer Chand Parakh vs Ashok Kumar etc. — 26/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 25th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBK230003252022
Filing Number
26/2022
Filing Date
05-11-2015
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
05-11-2015
Court
ADJ Nokha Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ Nokha
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahaveer Chand Parakh
Adv. Kedarnath Soni
Respondent(s)
Ashok Kumar etc.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Nokha
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 26/2022: Mahaveer Chand Parakh v. Ashok Kumar and Others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District (Rajasthan) Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court ALLOWED the plaintiff's suit for declaration of ownership and recovery of possession with permanent injunction against the defendants. Key Findings 1. Ownership Established: The court declared that Mahaveer Chand Parakh (plaintiff) is the lawful owner of the disputed property (Plot No. 737, measuring 800 sq. yards) through a registered sale deed dated 01.02.2011. 2. Chain of Ownership Validated: The court traced and validated the complete chain of transactions: - Original property holder Ramzan gifted it to wife Salman - Salman sold it to Gulzari in 1974 - Gulzari sold to Kalusram and Anwar in 2007 - They subdivided and sold western portion (800 sq. yards) to Ashok Kumar in 2010 - Ashok Kumar sold to plaintiff in 2011 3. Defendant's Transactions Voided: Transactions by Defendant No. 4 (Banwarilal) claiming to sell disputed property to Defendants 5 and 6 on 24.05.2016 were declared null and void as he had no valid authority—Mahabub (whose sale deed was questioned) was never the legitimate owner. 4. Possession Restored: Plaintiff is entitled to physical possession of the disputed property and its recovery from all illegal occupants. 5. Perpetual Injunction: Defendants are restrained from transferring or encumbering the property in any manner. Costs: Each party bears their own expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 26/2022: Mahaveer Chand Parakh v. Ashok Kumar and Others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District (Rajasthan) Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court ALLOWED the plaintiff's suit for declaration of ownership and recovery of possession with permanent injunction against the defendants. Key Findings 1. Ownership Established: The court declared that Mahaveer Chand Parakh (plaintiff) is the lawful owner of the disputed property (Plot No. 737, measuring 800 sq. yards) through a registered sale deed dated 01.02.2011. 2. Chain of Ownership Validated: The court traced and validated the complete chain of transactions: - Original property holder Ramzan gifted it to wife Salman - Salman sold it to Gulzari in 1974 - Gulzari sold to Kalusram and Anwar in 2007 - They subdivided and sold western portion (800 sq. yards) to Ashok Kumar in 2010 - Ashok Kumar sold to plaintiff in 2011 3. Defendant's Transactions Voided: Transactions by Defendant No. 4 (Banwarilal) claiming to sell disputed property to Defendants 5 and 6 on 24.05.2016 were declared null and void as he had no valid authority—Mahabub (whose sale deed was questioned) was never the legitimate owner. 4. Possession Restored: Plaintiff is entitled to physical possession of the disputed property and its recovery from all illegal occupants. 5. Perpetual Injunction: Defendants are restrained from transferring or encumbering the property in any manner. Costs: Each party bears their own expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts