Rajshri vs Haji Ayub Ali — 34/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBK230002532022

Filing Number

34/2022

Filing Date

05-Jan-2015

Registration No

34/2022

Registration Date

05-Jan-2015

Court

ADJ Nokha Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ Nokha

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajshri

    Adv. Kedarnath Soni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Haji Ayub Ali

  2. 2.Kaluram

  3. 3.Anwar Ali

  4. 4.Banwari Lal Bishnoi

  5. 5.Hameed Raja

  6. 6.Munniram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 34/2022 Case: Rajshri v. Haji Ayub Ali and others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court accepted the plaintiff's (Rajshri's) suit and declared that: 1. Rajshri is the sole legitimate owner of the disputed plot (Bhoomikhand No. 737, eastern half of 800 square yards) based on the registered sale deed dated 15.03.2011. 2. Rajshri is entitled to possession of the property, which she should recover from the defendants and all intervening transferees. 3. A perpetual injunction is imposed restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating, or encumbering the property in any manner that would harm Rajshri's civil rights. Key Reasoning - The court found that Gulzari (the original owner) validly transferred the property through a registered deed dated 28.12.2007 to Kalu Ram and Anwar Ali, who subsequently sold it to Haji Ayub Ali, who finally sold it to Rajshri. - The court rejected defendant No. 4's (Banwari Lal's) unregistered sale deed dated 01.03.2012, finding it legally invalid as Mahboob (from whom Banwari claimed to buy) had no valid ownership rights. - Court determined that property transfers during the pendency of the lawsuit remain unaffected by restraining orders issued by courts until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Nokha

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  14. 07-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  16. 22-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  18. 19-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  19. 05-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  21. 14-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  23. 31-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  24. 17-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  26. 03-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  27. 29-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  28. 20-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  29. 12-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  30. 09-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  31. 24-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  32. 17-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  33. 08-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  34. 30-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  35. 23-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  36. 16-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  37. 12-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  38. 02-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  39. 24-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  40. 19-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  41. 04-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  42. 21-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  43. 28-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  44. 19-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  45. 18-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  46. 17-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  47. 13-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  48. 07-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ Nokha

  49. 13-Dec-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  50. 27-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  51. 23-Aug-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  52. 12-Jul-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  53. 26-Apr-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  54. 15-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  55. 02-Feb-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  56. 08-Dec-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Nokha

  57. 20-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Nokha

  58. 08-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Nokha

  59. 08-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Nokha

  60. 25-May-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Nokha

  61. 18-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Nokha

  62. 01-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 05-Jan-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 34/2022 Case: Rajshri v. Haji Ayub Ali and others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court accepted the plaintiff's (Rajshri's) suit and declared that: 1. Rajshri is the sole legitimate owner of the disputed plot (Bhoomikhand No. 737, eastern half of 800 square yards) based on the registered sale deed dated 15.03.2011. 2. Rajshri is entitled to possession of the property, which she should recover from the defendants and all intervening transferees. 3. A perpetual injunction is imposed restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating, or encumbering the property in any manner that would harm Rajshri's civil rights. Key Reasoning - The court found that Gulzari (the original owner) validly transferred the property through a registered deed dated 28.12.2007 to Kalu Ram and Anwar Ali, who subsequently sold it to Haji Ayub Ali, who finally sold it to Rajshri. - The court rejected defendant No. 4's (Banwari Lal's) unregistered sale deed dated 01.03.2012, finding it legally invalid as Mahboob (from whom Banwari claimed to buy) had no valid ownership rights. - Court determined that property transfers during the pendency of the lawsuit remain unaffected by restraining orders issued by courts until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case