Rajshri vs Haji Ayub Ali — 34/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 25th March 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBK230002532022

Case disposed

Filing Number

34/2022

Filing Date

05-01-2015

Registration No

34/2022

Registration Date

05-01-2015

Court

ADJ Nokha Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ Nokha

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

Rajshri

Adv. Kedarnath Soni

Respondent(s)

Haji Ayub Ali

Kaluram

Anwar Ali

Banwari Lal Bishnoi

Hameed Raja

Munniram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ Nokha

25-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

19-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

17-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

13-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Judgement

Summary of Case 34/2022 Case: Rajshri v. Haji Ayub Ali and others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court accepted the plaintiff's (Rajshri's) suit and declared that: 1. Rajshri is the sole legitimate owner of the disputed plot (Bhoomikhand No. 737, eastern half of 800 square yards) based on the registered sale deed dated 15.03.2011. 2. Rajshri is entitled to possession of the property, which she should recover from the defendants and all intervening transferees. 3. A perpetual injunction is imposed restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating, or encumbering the property in any manner that would harm Rajshri's civil rights. Key Reasoning - The court found that Gulzari (the original owner) validly transferred the property through a registered deed dated 28.12.2007 to Kalu Ram and Anwar Ali, who subsequently sold it to Haji Ayub Ali, who finally sold it to Rajshri. - The court rejected defendant No. 4's (Banwari Lal's) unregistered sale deed dated 01.03.2012, finding it legally invalid as Mahboob (from whom Banwari claimed to buy) had no valid ownership rights. - Court determined that property transfers during the pendency of the lawsuit remain unaffected by restraining orders issued by courts until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 34/2022 Case: Rajshri v. Haji Ayub Ali and others Court: Additional District Judge, Nokha, Bikaner District Decision Date: 25.03.2026 Court's Decision The court accepted the plaintiff's (Rajshri's) suit and declared that: 1. Rajshri is the sole legitimate owner of the disputed plot (Bhoomikhand No. 737, eastern half of 800 square yards) based on the registered sale deed dated 15.03.2011. 2. Rajshri is entitled to possession of the property, which she should recover from the defendants and all intervening transferees. 3. A perpetual injunction is imposed restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating, or encumbering the property in any manner that would harm Rajshri's civil rights. Key Reasoning - The court found that Gulzari (the original owner) validly transferred the property through a registered deed dated 28.12.2007 to Kalu Ram and Anwar Ali, who subsequently sold it to Haji Ayub Ali, who finally sold it to Rajshri. - The court rejected defendant No. 4's (Banwari Lal's) unregistered sale deed dated 01.03.2012, finding it legally invalid as Mahboob (from whom Banwari claimed to buy) had no valid ownership rights. - Court determined that property transfers during the pendency of the lawsuit remain unaffected by restraining orders issued by courts until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Nokha Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case