Gajendra Shrimali etc. vs Pankaj Shrimali etc. — 286/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBK230000982014
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
286/2014
Filing Date
30-07-2014
Registration No
286/2014
Registration Date
30-07-2014
Court
ADJ Nokha Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ Nokha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajendra Shrimali etc.
Adv. Rakesh Ranga
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Shrimali etc.
Sangram Singh Shekhawat
Pushpendra Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Nokha
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 15-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 01-05-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Gajendra Shrimali v. Pankaj Shrimali Outcome: The court ALLOWED the petition and DECLARED the disputed sale deed dated 21.05.2014 as null, void, forged, and executed through fraud. The petitioners were declared to retain their rights and interests in the disputed agricultural land. A perpetual injunction was imposed restraining respondents from transferring, alienating, or wrongfully dispossessing the petitioners from the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Gajendra Shrimali v. Pankaj Shrimali Outcome: The court ALLOWED the petition and DECLARED the disputed sale deed dated 21.05.2014 as null, void, forged, and executed through fraud. The petitioners were declared to retain their rights and interests in the disputed agricultural land. A perpetual injunction was imposed restraining respondents from transferring, alienating, or wrongfully dispossessing the petitioners from the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts