Tolaram etc. vs State Advocate - PP — 17/2015
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 02nd May 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJBK130000422015
Filing Number
17/2015
Filing Date
08-12-2015
Registration No
17/2015
Registration Date
08-12-2015
Court
ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court
Judge
1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tolaram etc.
Adv. Mohan Lal Soni
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan (17/2015) The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Tolaram and Kojuram against their conviction under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust). The court found that extensive witness testimony and medical evidence substantiated that the appellants harassed the victim for dowry, falsely accused her of infertility despite medical reports confirming her normalcy, and unlawfully retained her wedding gifts. Upholding the trial court's conviction and sentencing (3 years imprisonment plus fine under both sections), the appellate court determined the evidence adequately proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Tolaram v. State of Rajasthan (17/2015) The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Tolaram and Kojuram against their conviction under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust). The court found that extensive witness testimony and medical evidence substantiated that the appellants harassed the victim for dowry, falsely accused her of infertility despite medical reports confirming her normalcy, and unlawfully retained her wedding gifts. Upholding the trial court's conviction and sentencing (3 years imprisonment plus fine under both sections), the appellate court determined the evidence adequately proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts