State vs Purnaram etc. Advocate - Babu Lal Darji — 75/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 308,364,325,342,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBK130000202016
Filing Number
75/2016
Filing Date
18-05-2016
Registration No
75/2016
Registration Date
18-05-2016
Court
ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court
Judge
1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
Sri Dungergarh P S
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Purnaram etc. Advocate - Babu Lal Darji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Disposed
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Purnaram (Case 75/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge acquitted the accused Purnaram and Jaisaram of charges under IPC Sections 364/34 (kidnapping with intent to murder) and 325/34 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt), but convicted them under Sections 342/34 (wrongful confinement) and 323/34 (voluntarily causing hurt). The court granted them probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with one-year probation period upon deposit of Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each, imposing Rs. 3,000 compensation to the victim. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the serious charges of kidnapping with murderous intent and grievous injury. Medical evidence showed only simple injuries, not grievous ones. Eyewitness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility. However, the court found sufficient evidence that the accused unlawfully confined and assaulted the victim after dragging him from outside into their house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Purnaram (Case 75/2016) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge acquitted the accused Purnaram and Jaisaram of charges under IPC Sections 364/34 (kidnapping with intent to murder) and 325/34 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt), but convicted them under Sections 342/34 (wrongful confinement) and 323/34 (voluntarily causing hurt). The court granted them probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with one-year probation period upon deposit of Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each, imposing Rs. 3,000 compensation to the victim. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the serious charges of kidnapping with murderous intent and grievous injury. Medical evidence showed only simple injuries, not grievous ones. Eyewitness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility. However, the court found sufficient evidence that the accused unlawfully confined and assaulted the victim after dragging him from outside into their house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts