State vs Naurang ram Advocate - Poonam Chand Maru — 328/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304B,498A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBK130000092015
Filing Number
328/2015
Filing Date
30-Oct-2015
Registration No
328/2015
Registration Date
30-Oct-2015
Court
ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court
Judge
1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
Seruna P S
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Naurang ram Advocate - Poonam Chand Maru
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
copy of JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Naurang Ram (Session Case 328/2015) Court Decision (Date: 19-03-2026): The defendants Naurang Ram (husband) and Mohni Devi (mother-in-law) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty related to dowry), 304-B (dowry death), and Section 34 (common intention). Key Facts: The deceased Gomti Devi died in a fire at her in-laws' residence in Bhoja village on September 4, 2015. The prosecution alleged the defendants tortured and harassed her over dowry demands, leading her to set herself on fire in desperation after seven years of marriage. Court's Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included: (1) no witness saw the actual fire starting; (2) the deceased's father could not pinpoint when harassment occurred or provide specific dates; (3) no medical evidence of prior abuse; (4) prosecution witnesses were biased family members; (5) the hut lacked electricity/gas connections, suggesting accidental fire from cooking oil lamps was plausible; (6) no evidence of cruelty "soon before death" as required by law. The court noted that the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act requires proof of harassment immediately preceding death, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
13-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
27-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
19-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
10-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
28-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
13-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
03-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
17-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
03-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
26-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
19-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
07-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
31-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
10-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
10-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
04-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
20-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
30-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
27-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
02-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
-
05-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
10-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
12-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
01-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
12-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
25-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
02-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
15-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
01-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
06-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
12-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
20-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
01-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
13-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
02-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
30-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
22-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
20-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
14-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
22-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
11-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
22-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
28-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
17-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
18-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
19-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
18-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
25-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
06-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
11-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
04-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
05-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
19-Feb-2020
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
07-Nov-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
25-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
08-Aug-2019
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
10-Apr-2019
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
06-Feb-2019
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
15-Nov-2018
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
07-Aug-2018
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
08-May-2018
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
ADJ Sri Dungargarh
-
08-Mar-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 328/2015
Case Summary: State v. Naurang Ram (Session Case 328/2015) Court Decision (Date: 19-03-2026): The defendants Naurang Ram (husband) and Mohni Devi (mother-in-law) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty related to dowry), 304-B (dowry death), and Section 34 (common intention). Key Facts: The deceased Gomti Devi died in a fire at her in-laws' residence in Bhoja village on September 4, 2015. The prosecution alleged the defendants tortured and harassed her over dowry demands, leading her to set herself on fire in desperation after seven years of marriage. Court's Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included: (1) no witness saw the actual fire starting; (2) the deceased's father could not pinpoint when harassment occurred or provide specific dates; (3) no medical evidence of prior abuse; (4) prosecution witnesses were biased family members; (5) the hut lacked electricity/gas connections, suggesting accidental fire from cooking oil lamps was plausible; (6) no evidence of cruelty "soon before death" as required by law. The court noted that the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act requires proof of harassment immediately preceding death, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts