State vs Sandeep Kumar etc. Advocate - RANVIR SINGH KHICHI — 138/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBK130000092014
Filing Number
138/2014
Filing Date
19-07-2014
Registration No
138/2014
Registration Date
19-07-2014
Court
ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court
Judge
1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
300
Police Station
Sri Dungergarh P S
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Sandeep Kumar etc. Advocate - RANVIR SINGH KHICHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Disposed
Restored
Final arguments
Final arguments
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Restored |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Session Case No. 10/2014, State v. Sandeep Kumar and others Court: Additional District & Sessions Judge, Shridungargarh, Bikaner District, Rajasthan Judgment Date: 16-03-2026 Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons (Sandeep Kumar, Hareram, Abhishek, Dinesh, and Kishore Singh) of charges under IPC Section 395 (dacoity), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The victim complainant's testimony contradicted the FIR facts, and no recoveries were made from the accused during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Session Case No. 10/2014, State v. Sandeep Kumar and others Court: Additional District & Sessions Judge, Shridungargarh, Bikaner District, Rajasthan Judgment Date: 16-03-2026 Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons (Sandeep Kumar, Hareram, Abhishek, Dinesh, and Kishore Singh) of charges under IPC Section 395 (dacoity), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The victim complainant's testimony contradicted the FIR facts, and no recoveries were made from the accused during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts