Aziz vs State Advocate - PP — 1/2017

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJBK130000072017

Filing Number

2/2017

Filing Date

23-Mar-2017

Registration No

1/2017

Registration Date

23-Mar-2017

Court

ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court

Judge

1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aziz

    Adv. Mohan Lal Soni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    copy of JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Aziz v. State of Rajasthan (Appeal 11/2017) The appellate court partially allowed Aziz's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380). The lower court had sentenced him to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine on each charge. The appellate court found that while the evidence established the stolen goods were recovered from the appellant, critical evidentiary gaps existed—including lack of eyewitness testimony, no fingerprint evidence, and discrepancies in the recovered mobile phones versus those listed in the FIR. Considering the appellant's poor background, first-time offense, and the deceased complainant's son's withdrawal of claims, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing him on one-year probation with ₹2,000 prosecution costs instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  4. 05-May-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  18. 28-Aug-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  22. 11-Dec-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  23. 18-Oct-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  24. 07-Aug-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  25. 07-Jun-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  26. 01-Apr-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  27. 01-Feb-2024

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  28. 24-Nov-2023

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  29. 13-Sep-2023

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  30. 20-Jun-2023

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  31. 19-Apr-2023

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  32. 06-Feb-2023

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  33. 28-Nov-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  34. 15-Sep-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  35. 08-Jun-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  36. 23-Mar-2022

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  37. 26-Nov-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  38. 26-Aug-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  39. 10-Jun-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  40. 07-Apr-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  41. 06-Jan-2021

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  42. 23-Sep-2020

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  43. 25-Jun-2020

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  44. 21-May-2020

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  45. 26-Mar-2020

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  46. 20-Mar-2020

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  47. 06-Nov-2019

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  48. 22-Aug-2019

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  49. 08-May-2019

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  50. 09-Jan-2019

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  51. 06-Sep-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  52. 28-Jun-2018

    Awaiting records

    ADJ Sri Dungargarh

  53. 11-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 23-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Aziz v. State of Rajasthan (Appeal 11/2017) The appellate court partially allowed Aziz's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380). The lower court had sentenced him to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine on each charge. The appellate court found that while the evidence established the stolen goods were recovered from the appellant, critical evidentiary gaps existed—including lack of eyewitness testimony, no fingerprint evidence, and discrepancies in the recovered mobile phones versus those listed in the FIR. Considering the appellant's poor background, first-time offense, and the deceased complainant's son's withdrawal of claims, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing him on one-year probation with ₹2,000 prosecution costs instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case