Aziz vs State Advocate - PP — 1/2017
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 06th May 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJBK130000072017
Filing Number
2/2017
Filing Date
23-03-2017
Registration No
1/2017
Registration Date
23-03-2017
Court
ADJ Camp Court Sri Dungargarh Court
Judge
1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aziz
Adv. Mohan Lal Soni
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ Sri Dungargarh
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Aziz v. State of Rajasthan (Appeal 11/2017) The appellate court partially allowed Aziz's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380). The lower court had sentenced him to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine on each charge. The appellate court found that while the evidence established the stolen goods were recovered from the appellant, critical evidentiary gaps existed—including lack of eyewitness testimony, no fingerprint evidence, and discrepancies in the recovered mobile phones versus those listed in the FIR. Considering the appellant's poor background, first-time offense, and the deceased complainant's son's withdrawal of claims, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing him on one-year probation with ₹2,000 prosecution costs instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Aziz v. State of Rajasthan (Appeal 11/2017) The appellate court partially allowed Aziz's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380). The lower court had sentenced him to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine on each charge. The appellate court found that while the evidence established the stolen goods were recovered from the appellant, critical evidentiary gaps existed—including lack of eyewitness testimony, no fingerprint evidence, and discrepancies in the recovered mobile phones versus those listed in the FIR. Considering the appellant's poor background, first-time offense, and the deceased complainant's son's withdrawal of claims, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing him on one-year probation with ₹2,000 prosecution costs instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts