Ashok Kumar vs Babulal — 58/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o39r1,2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBK110001432025
Filing Number
143/2025
Filing Date
27-08-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
27-08-2025
Court
CJ JD Kolayat Court
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Div
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Kumar
Adv. RAJENDRA VISHNOI
Respondent(s)
Babulal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Div
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ashok Kumar v. Babulal (58/2025) Court Decision (dated 13.03.2026): The Civil Judge partially granted Ashok Kumar's petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2, CPC. The court found a prima facie case regarding shops 1 and 2 in Missi Market, Bajju Khalsiya, with disputed possession between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 (Dinesh Kumar). However, the court rejected the petition regarding shops 3 and 4. The court restrained both parties from interfering with each other's independent business operations in the disputed shops and prohibited them from altering the court-appointed commissioner's record. Both parties were permitted to maintain separate businesses in their respective portions without hindrance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ashok Kumar v. Babulal (58/2025) Court Decision (dated 13.03.2026): The Civil Judge partially granted Ashok Kumar's petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2, CPC. The court found a prima facie case regarding shops 1 and 2 in Missi Market, Bajju Khalsiya, with disputed possession between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 (Dinesh Kumar). However, the court rejected the petition regarding shops 3 and 4. The court restrained both parties from interfering with each other's independent business operations in the disputed shops and prohibited them from altering the court-appointed commissioner's record. Both parties were permitted to maintain separate businesses in their respective portions without hindrance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts