Ashok Kumar vs Babulal — 58/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o39r1,2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBK110001432025
Filing Number
143/2025
Filing Date
27-Aug-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
27-Aug-2025
Court
CJ JD Kolayat Court
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Div
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashok Kumar
Adv. RAJENDRA VISHNOI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babulal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Ashok Kumar v. Babulal (58/2025) Court Decision (dated 13.03.2026): The Civil Judge partially granted Ashok Kumar's petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2, CPC. The court found a prima facie case regarding shops 1 and 2 in Missi Market, Bajju Khalsiya, with disputed possession between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 (Dinesh Kumar). However, the court rejected the petition regarding shops 3 and 4. The court restrained both parties from interfering with each other's independent business operations in the disputed shops and prohibited them from altering the court-appointed commissioner's record. Both parties were permitted to maintain separate businesses in their respective portions without hindrance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
29-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
22-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
19-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
15-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
12-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
08-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
15-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
11-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
29-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Nov-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
13-Nov-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
31-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
30-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
13-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
10-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
09-Oct-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
29-Sep-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
08-Sep-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
06-Sep-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Sep-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
01-Sep-2025
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
27-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2025
Case Summary: Ashok Kumar v. Babulal (58/2025) Court Decision (dated 13.03.2026): The Civil Judge partially granted Ashok Kumar's petition for interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1-2, CPC. The court found a prima facie case regarding shops 1 and 2 in Missi Market, Bajju Khalsiya, with disputed possession between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 (Dinesh Kumar). However, the court rejected the petition regarding shops 3 and 4. The court restrained both parties from interfering with each other's independent business operations in the disputed shops and prohibited them from altering the court-appointed commissioner's record. Both parties were permitted to maintain separate businesses in their respective portions without hindrance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts