State vs bhooraram Etc. Advocate - MSR — 694/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th May 2026.
Cro - Criminal Orginal
CNR: RJBK100000322006
Filing Number
571/2014
Filing Date
06-01-2006
Registration No
694/2014
Registration Date
06-01-2006
Court
JM Kolayat Court
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
Kolayat Police Station
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
bhooraram Etc. Advocate - MSR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Appearance of accused |
| 02-05-2026 | Appearance of accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Bhooram & Others (694/2014) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Devkaran alias Devaram and Lakshmanram of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused Bhooram was absconded and separately discharged, the court determined that witness testimony and documentary evidence were insufficient to establish that the accused stole property (tools, bedding, approximately ₹12,000) from complainant Ratiram's house during November 2005 without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Bhooram & Others (694/2014) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Devkaran alias Devaram and Lakshmanram of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused Bhooram was absconded and separately discharged, the court determined that witness testimony and documentary evidence were insufficient to establish that the accused stole property (tools, bedding, approximately ₹12,000) from complainant Ratiram's house during November 2005 without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts