State vs Bajrang lal — 2918/2014

Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cro - Criminal Orginal

CNR: RJBK080007282014

Filing Number

3012/2014

Filing Date

30-Oct-2014

Registration No

2918/2014

Registration Date

30-Oct-2014

Court

ACJM JM Nokha Taluka HQ criminal

Judge

2-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. App IInd

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bajrang lal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Bajrang Lal (CIS 2918/2014) Court Decision: The accused Bajrang Lal was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 352, 336, 427, 504, and 506, with the benefit of doubt granted due to insufficient evidence proving the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found material contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies and FIR statements, particularly regarding the alleged incident on August 14, 2014, where the complainant claimed the accused deliberately rammed his vehicle. Critical witnesses (PWs 1, 3, 6, 7) testified that only general conversation occurred between parties, contradicting the written report's violent allegations. The investigating officer's testimony revealed investigative lapses and unverified claims about recovered vehicle damage. The prosecution failed to establish criminal intent or deliberate criminal act conclusively through oral or documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  11. 01-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  12. 26-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  13. 03-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  14. 01-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  15. 27-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha

  18. 05-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 20-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 05-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 15-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 15-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 29-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 23-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 01-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 09-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 06-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 06-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 03-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 16-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 22-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 09-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 18-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 16-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 03-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 23-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 18-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 21-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 08-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 09-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 23-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 12-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 05-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 09-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 08-Aug-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 06-Feb-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 31-Oct-2016

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 04-Jul-2016

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 18-Apr-2016

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 14-Dec-2015

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 28-Sep-2015

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 04-May-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 30-Oct-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2918/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Bajrang Lal (CIS 2918/2014) Court Decision: The accused Bajrang Lal was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 352, 336, 427, 504, and 506, with the benefit of doubt granted due to insufficient evidence proving the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found material contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies and FIR statements, particularly regarding the alleged incident on August 14, 2014, where the complainant claimed the accused deliberately rammed his vehicle. Critical witnesses (PWs 1, 3, 6, 7) testified that only general conversation occurred between parties, contradicting the written report's violent allegations. The investigating officer's testimony revealed investigative lapses and unverified claims about recovered vehicle damage. The prosecution failed to establish criminal intent or deliberate criminal act conclusively through oral or documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case