State vs khema ram Advocate - padma ram — 447/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,323,506. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBK080006342020
Filing Number
634/2020
Filing Date
01-07-2020
Registration No
447/2020
Registration Date
01-07-2020
Court
ACJM JM Nokha Taluka HQ criminal
Judge
2-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
Jasarasar Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
khema ram Advocate - padma ram
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Nokha
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 28-01-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 02-01-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Khemaaram of house trespass charges (IPC Section 452) due to insufficient evidence, finding that the complainant's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's narrative by stating the beating occurred outside the house rather than inside. The accused had already been discharged under Sections 323 and 506 (IPC) on July 25, 2023, following a settlement between the parties, and the court granted him benefit of doubt on the remaining charge, holding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Khemaaram of house trespass charges (IPC Section 452) due to insufficient evidence, finding that the complainant's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's narrative by stating the beating occurred outside the house rather than inside. The accused had already been discharged under Sections 323 and 506 (IPC) on July 25, 2023, following a settlement between the parties, and the court granted him benefit of doubt on the remaining charge, holding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts