Rajasthan Government vs Mohanram etc- — 1898/2014

Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cro - Criminal Orginal

CNR: RJBK080002122012

Filing Number

1170/2014

Filing Date

06-Aug-2012

Registration No

1898/2014

Registration Date

06-Aug-2012

Court

ACJM JM Nokha Taluka HQ criminal

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

362/12

Police Station

Nokha Police Station

Year

2012

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Government

    Adv. App IInd

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohanram etc-

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Rajasthan Government v. Mohanram & Others (Case 1898/2014) Court Decision: The accused (Mohanram, Omprakash, Madhusudhan, and Harishankar) were acquitted of charges under Section 448 read with Section 34 IPC (criminal trespass and criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass on the complainant's property in Jirassar village between June 20-July 4, 2012. While the complainant's witnesses provided testimony, critical independent corroboration was absent. The investigation officer's own cross-examination acknowledged the disputed property had belonged to the accused's relative (Depalram) since 1976, creating ambiguity about rightful possession and undermining the trespass charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 03-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 05-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 05-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 07-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 27-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 28-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 14-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 16-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 09-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 01-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 01-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 20-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 01-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 19-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 23-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 08-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 04-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 03-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 02-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 28-Mar-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  41. 20-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  42. 10-Jan-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  43. 08-Dec-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  44. 21-Nov-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  45. 30-Sep-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  46. 18-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 08-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 18-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 05-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 04-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 12-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 02-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 30-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  54. 22-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  55. 11-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  56. 17-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  57. 31-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  58. 23-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  59. 12-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  60. 10-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  61. 15-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  62. 30-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  63. 26-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  64. 20-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  65. 07-Aug-2019

    Restored

    Acjm

  66. 24-Mar-2015

    Disposed

    Acjm

  67. 24-Mar-2015

    Disposed

    Acjm

  68. 21-Mar-2015

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  69. 28-Jan-2015

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  70. 16-Aug-2014

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  71. 30-Apr-2014

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  72. 21-Nov-2013

    Prosecution Evidence

  73. 02-Nov-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 06-Aug-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1898/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajasthan Government v. Mohanram & Others (Case 1898/2014) Court Decision: The accused (Mohanram, Omprakash, Madhusudhan, and Harishankar) were acquitted of charges under Section 448 read with Section 34 IPC (criminal trespass and criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass on the complainant's property in Jirassar village between June 20-July 4, 2012. While the complainant's witnesses provided testimony, critical independent corroboration was absent. The investigation officer's own cross-examination acknowledged the disputed property had belonged to the accused's relative (Depalram) since 1976, creating ambiguity about rightful possession and undermining the trespass charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case