State vs Papuram Advocate - Hanuman chodhry — 1017/2014
Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 30th March 2026.
Raj Exe Act - Rajasthan Excise Act
CNR: RJBK080000212014
Filing Number
2253/2014
Filing Date
07-01-2014
Registration No
1017/2014
Registration Date
07-01-2014
Court
ACJM JM Nokha Taluka HQ criminal
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
FIR Details
FIR Number
426
Police Station
Nokha Police Station
Year
2013
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Rampratap bishnoi
Respondent(s)
Papuram Advocate - Hanuman chodhry
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of State v. Papuram (Case 1017/2014) The court convicted Papuram for illegal possession and sale of alcohol in violation of Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. On August 4, 2013, police discovered multiple cases of Indian and foreign liquor bottles without proper licenses in a hotel room where Papuram was present. The court found prosecution witnesses credible despite minor discrepancies and ruled that absence of independent witnesses doesn't vitiate recovery when official evidence is trustworthy. Papuram was sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment plus a fine of Rs. 20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of State v. Papuram (Case 1017/2014) The court convicted Papuram for illegal possession and sale of alcohol in violation of Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. On August 4, 2013, police discovered multiple cases of Indian and foreign liquor bottles without proper licenses in a hotel room where Papuram was present. The court found prosecution witnesses credible despite minor discrepancies and ruled that absence of independent witnesses doesn't vitiate recovery when official evidence is trustworthy. Papuram was sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment plus a fine of Rs. 20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts