JethuSingh vs State etc Advocate - PP — 1075/2016
Case under Temporary Injuction Section 8. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Co - Civil Original Cases
CNR: RJBK030001832016
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
1981/2016
Filing Date
20-06-2016
Registration No
1075/2016
Registration Date
20-06-2016
Court
CJ SD Bikaner District HQ
Judge
1-Sr.Civil Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JethuSingh
Adv. Brijesh Madan
Respondent(s)
State etc Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sr.Civil Judge
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 1075/2016 Summary Outcome: The petition filed by JethuSingh on 07-11-2016 under Order 11 Rule 1 of CPC was accepted. The court directed the respondent (State/Chief Forest Officer) to submit written replies to four specific questions regarding grazing land development work: (1) whether the work is currently ongoing, (2) whether grazing restrictions were removed after completion, (3) whether the collector has legal authority to issue no-objection certificates, and (4) the current status of the disputed land. The case was adjourned for the respondent's clarification on these matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1075/2016 Summary Outcome: The petition filed by JethuSingh on 07-11-2016 under Order 11 Rule 1 of CPC was accepted. The court directed the respondent (State/Chief Forest Officer) to submit written replies to four specific questions regarding grazing land development work: (1) whether the work is currently ongoing, (2) whether grazing restrictions were removed after completion, (3) whether the collector has legal authority to issue no-objection certificates, and (4) the current status of the disputed land. The case was adjourned for the respondent's clarification on these matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts