STATE GOVT. vs RETESH Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA — 1589/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJBH160000312015

Filing Number

283/2015

Filing Date

12-Mar-2015

Registration No

1589/2015

Registration Date

12-Mar-2015

Court

JM Roopwas Taluka

Judge

1-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

406

Police Station

PS RUDAWAL

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVT.

    Adv. APO ROOPBAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RETESH Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    judgement copyView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Civil Court of Rupvas, Bharatpur District (Rajasthan) convicted accused Ritesh under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 for voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons during an altercation on August 5, 2014. However, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a 6-month period, requiring a personal bond of ₹20,000 and additional prosecution costs of ₹10,000, avoiding imprisonment based on his prolonged pretrial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  15. 03-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  16. 19-Sep-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  18. 19-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  19. 29-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  21. 30-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  22. 19-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  23. 29-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  24. 25-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  25. 20-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  26. 06-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  27. 24-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  28. 12-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  29. 05-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    Acj and Jm

  30. 21-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  31. 19-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  32. 21-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  33. 16-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  34. 05-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

  35. 18-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  36. 12-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  37. 20-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  38. 26-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  39. 02-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  40. 15-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  41. 08-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  42. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  43. 15-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  44. 22-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  45. 21-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm

  46. 10-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  47. 16-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  48. 09-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  49. 24-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  50. 06-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  51. 25-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  52. 15-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  53. 31-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  54. 13-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  55. 05-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  56. 20-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  57. 16-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  58. 18-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  59. 18-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  60. 20-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  61. 20-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  62. 05-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  63. 11-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  64. 02-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  65. 17-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  66. 02-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  67. 11-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  68. 02-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  69. 13-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  70. 09-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  71. 07-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  72. 27-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  73. 05-Oct-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  74. 23-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  75. 16-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  76. 05-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  77. 03-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  78. 07-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  79. 03-Mar-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  80. 25-Jan-2017

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  81. 05-Dec-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  82. 27-Oct-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  83. 26-Aug-2016

    Charge

  84. 25-Jun-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  85. 07-Apr-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  86. 26-Feb-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  87. 18-Jan-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  88. 06-Nov-2015

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  89. 06-Oct-2015

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  90. 06-Aug-2015

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  91. 10-Jul-2015

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  92. 18-May-2015

    Charge

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  93. 20-Apr-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  94. 12-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1589/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Court of Rupvas, Bharatpur District (Rajasthan) convicted accused Ritesh under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 for voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons during an altercation on August 5, 2014. However, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a 6-month period, requiring a personal bond of ₹20,000 and additional prosecution costs of ₹10,000, avoiding imprisonment based on his prolonged pretrial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case