STATE GOVT. vs RETESH Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA — 1589/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 02nd April 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJBH160000312015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
283/2015
Filing Date
12-03-2015
Registration No
1589/2015
Registration Date
12-03-2015
Court
JM Roopwas Taluka
Judge
1-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
PS RUDAWAL
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE GOVT.
Adv. APO ROOPBAS
Respondent(s)
RETESH Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 26-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Civil Court of Rupvas, Bharatpur District (Rajasthan) convicted accused Ritesh under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 for voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons during an altercation on August 5, 2014. However, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a 6-month period, requiring a personal bond of ₹20,000 and additional prosecution costs of ₹10,000, avoiding imprisonment based on his prolonged pretrial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Civil Court of Rupvas, Bharatpur District (Rajasthan) convicted accused Ritesh under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 for voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons during an altercation on August 5, 2014. However, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a 6-month period, requiring a personal bond of ₹20,000 and additional prosecution costs of ₹10,000, avoiding imprisonment based on his prolonged pretrial detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts