RAMLA vs GIRRAJ ETC — 33/2024

Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction (Case No. 38/2024) filed against the defendants regarding a disputed shared lane (chowk) leading to the plaintiff's residential property in Kherli village, Vair, Bharatpur district. The court found that the defendants' property boundaries and the shared pathway had been properly established through documentary evidence (maps and construction permits dated 1983), and that the plaintiff failed to prove encroachment on a common lane. The court partially granted the defendants' counter-claim, restraining the plaintiff from obstructing the defendants' use and construction rights within their demarcated property area (87×31.6 feet), while rejecting claims regarding complete removal of plaintiff's structures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.