jagram vs bharat etc — 21/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section civilsuit. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 17th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBH100001922024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
107/2024
Filing Date
06-01-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
06-01-2024
Court
CJ SD Weir Taluka
Judge
1-ACJM No. 01
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
jagram
Adv. HARISH BHARADWAJ
Respondent(s)
bharat etc
hukam singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM No. 01
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court declared void a deed of sale dated 23-10-2023 executed by Defendant No. 1 (Bharat) in favor of Defendant No. 2 (Hukumsingh) for agricultural land in Bharatpur, Rajasthan. The court found that Bharat had already validly sold and transferred the same property to the plaintiff (Jagaram) on 22-12-2011 through a registered deed, after which the plaintiff possessed and cultivated the land continuously. The court held that Bharat had no authority to sell the property again in 2023 since ownership had already passed to the plaintiff, making the subsequent deed null and void *ab initio*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court declared void a deed of sale dated 23-10-2023 executed by Defendant No. 1 (Bharat) in favor of Defendant No. 2 (Hukumsingh) for agricultural land in Bharatpur, Rajasthan. The court found that Bharat had already validly sold and transferred the same property to the plaintiff (Jagaram) on 22-12-2011 through a registered deed, after which the plaintiff possessed and cultivated the land continuously. The court held that Bharat had no authority to sell the property again in 2023 since ownership had already passed to the plaintiff, making the subsequent deed null and void *ab initio*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts