jagram vs bharat etc — 21/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section civilsuit. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBH100001922024

Filing Number

107/2024

Filing Date

06-Jan-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

06-Jan-2024

Court

CJ SD Weir Taluka

Judge

1-Acjm No. 01

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section civilsuit

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.jagram

    Adv. HARISH BHARADWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.bharat etc

  2. 2.hukam singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The court declared void a deed of sale dated 23-10-2023 executed by Defendant No. 1 (Bharat) in favor of Defendant No. 2 (Hukumsingh) for agricultural land in Bharatpur, Rajasthan. The court found that Bharat had already validly sold and transferred the same property to the plaintiff (Jagaram) on 22-12-2011 through a registered deed, after which the plaintiff possessed and cultivated the land continuously. The court held that Bharat had no authority to sell the property again in 2023 since ownership had already passed to the plaintiff, making the subsequent deed null and void *ab initio*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm No. 01

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm No. 01

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm No. 01

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm No. 01

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm No. 01

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  13. 09-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  15. 03-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  18. 17-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  19. 17-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 01

  20. 24-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Acjm No. 01

  21. 27-Oct-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  22. 16-Oct-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  23. 29-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  24. 16-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  25. 26-Aug-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  27. 06-May-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  28. 03-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  29. 25-Feb-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  30. 09-Jan-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  31. 10-Dec-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  32. 04-Nov-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm No. 01

  33. 24-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 06-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court declared void a deed of sale dated 23-10-2023 executed by Defendant No. 1 (Bharat) in favor of Defendant No. 2 (Hukumsingh) for agricultural land in Bharatpur, Rajasthan. The court found that Bharat had already validly sold and transferred the same property to the plaintiff (Jagaram) on 22-12-2011 through a registered deed, after which the plaintiff possessed and cultivated the land continuously. The court held that Bharat had no authority to sell the property again in 2023 since ownership had already passed to the plaintiff, making the subsequent deed null and void *ab initio*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case