natthi etc vs sahayak abhiyanta etc — 27/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section civil suit. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBH100000462025

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

19-Jul-2023

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

19-Jul-2023

Court

CJ SD Weir Taluka

Judge

2-Acjm No. 2

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section civil suit

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.natthi etc

  2. 2.chothi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.sahayak abhiyanta etc

  2. 2.jila collector

  3. 3.fatti

  4. 4.banni

  5. 5.malti

  6. 6.yadram

  7. 7.rupsingh

  8. 8.shyodan

  9. 9.swarup

  10. 10.devendra

  11. 11.devi singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants (Public Works Department) from constructing a road through the plaintiffs' disputed land parcels (Khasra nos. 646 and 647) in Suhans village. The court found that the plaintiffs were the rightful owners/cultivators of the land according to revenue records and that the defendants were attempting to forcibly acquire it for road widening without proper compensation or prior notice to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm No. 2

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  12. 03-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Acjm No. 2

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Acjm No. 2

  16. 20-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Acjm No. 2

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Acjm No. 2

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Acjm No. 2

  19. 23-May-2025

    Written Statement

    Acjm No. 2

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Acjm No. 2

  21. 15-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 19-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants (Public Works Department) from constructing a road through the plaintiffs' disputed land parcels (Khasra nos. 646 and 647) in Suhans village. The court found that the plaintiffs were the rightful owners/cultivators of the land according to revenue records and that the defendants were attempting to forcibly acquire it for road widening without proper compensation or prior notice to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case