mukat vs adhyaksh etc — 6/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o39r1,2. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 09th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJBH100000162025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2025
Filing Date
14-08-2023
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
14-08-2023
Court
CJ SD Weir Taluka
Judge
2-ACJM No. 2
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
mukat
Respondent(s)
adhyaksh etc
A.En
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM No. 2
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, directing the respondents not to shift a disputed agricultural electricity connection (Account No. 23040298) located in Rajgarh, Bharatpur district. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie right to the property and electricity connection through ancestral ownership, and that maintaining the status quo would not prejudice either party pending final adjudication of rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, directing the respondents not to shift a disputed agricultural electricity connection (Account No. 23040298) located in Rajgarh, Bharatpur district. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie right to the property and electricity connection through ancestral ownership, and that maintaining the status quo would not prejudice either party pending final adjudication of rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts