SURESH vs SHIV KUMAR — 5/2026
Case under Foreigners Act Section SUITFORCANCELATIONOFDANPATRADATED03-07-14ANDSUITFORPERMANANTINJUCTION. Disposed: Contested--Suit Dismissed, Counter claim dismissed on 30th March 2026.
REG. CIVIL SUIT
CNR: RJBH090000092026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2026
Filing Date
22-09-2015
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
26-09-2015
Court
CJ SD Bayana Taluka
Judge
4-ACJM No. 02
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Suit Dismissed, Counter claim dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH
Respondent(s)
SHIV KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ACJM No. 02
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bharatpur, Rajasthan Case: C-S- No 03/2026 (CIS- No-5/2026) Decision Date: 30-03-2026 Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's suit challenging a disputed gift deed dated 03-07-2014 by which defendant no. 3 (Taufani) gifted ancestral agricultural land to defendants 1 and 2 without the plaintiff's consent. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove ancestral property ownership rights and that the gift deed was valid, being properly executed under Hindu Succession law provisions regarding inherited property. The plaintiff's claim for inheritance rights in the disputed land was dismissed with costs payable by the plaintiff to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bharatpur, Rajasthan Case: C-S- No 03/2026 (CIS- No-5/2026) Decision Date: 30-03-2026 Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's suit challenging a disputed gift deed dated 03-07-2014 by which defendant no. 3 (Taufani) gifted ancestral agricultural land to defendants 1 and 2 without the plaintiff's consent. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove ancestral property ownership rights and that the gift deed was valid, being properly executed under Hindu Succession law provisions regarding inherited property. The plaintiff's claim for inheritance rights in the disputed land was dismissed with costs payable by the plaintiff to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts