STATE GOVT. vs THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL — 50/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,376. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJBH070008982020

Filing Number

549/2020

Filing Date

23-Nov-2020

Registration No

50/2020

Registration Date

23-Nov-2020

Court

ADJ Bayana Taluka

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

152

Police Station

PS ROOPBAS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366,376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVT.

    Adv. ADDITIONAL P P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  10. 24-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  11. 16-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  12. 08-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  13. 07-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  14. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  15. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  16. 21-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  17. 26-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  20. 24-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  21. 06-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  22. 26-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  23. 13-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  24. 06-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  25. 11-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  26. 26-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  27. 27-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  28. 11-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ II

  29. 27-Jan-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  30. 13-Dec-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  31. 08-Dec-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  32. 06-Oct-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  33. 25-Aug-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  34. 23-Aug-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  35. 13-Jul-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  36. 18-May-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  37. 23-Mar-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ II

  38. 12-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 23-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case