STATE GOVT. vs THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL — 50/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,376. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJBH070008982020

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

549/2020

Filing Date

23-11-2020

Registration No

50/2020

Registration Date

23-11-2020

Court

ADJ Bayana Taluka

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

152

Police Station

PS ROOPBAS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366,376

Petitioner(s)

STATE GOVT.

Adv. ADDITIONAL P P

Respondent(s)

THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ II

09-03-2026

Disposed

02-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

21-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

06-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

19-12-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Bayana Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case