STATE GOVT. vs THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL — 50/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,376. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBH070008982020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
549/2020
Filing Date
23-11-2020
Registration No
50/2020
Registration Date
23-11-2020
Court
ADJ Bayana Taluka
Judge
2-ADJ II
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
152
Police Station
PS ROOPBAS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE GOVT.
Adv. ADDITIONAL P P
Respondent(s)
THANESHWAR Advocate - AMRIT LAL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ II
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 21-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 19-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rupabas, Bharatpur acquitted the accused Thaneshwar (22 years) of charges under IPC Sections 366 and 376 (kidnapping and rape) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included inconsistencies in the victim's statements, contradictory testimony from witnesses regarding the victim's age and consent, lack of credible evidence of forced abduction, and the victim's own admissions suggesting she willingly went with the accused. The court noted the victim was 21 years old at the time of the incident and had previously been married, making her a competent adult capable of exercising her own judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts