VIPUL vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P — 93/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBH070002652026

Filing Number

155/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Bayana Taluka

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

PS ROOPBAS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPUL

    Adv. SURENDRA SINGH PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Vipul Kumar's bail application filed under Section 483 CrPC on March 24, 2026. Vipul was arrested for alleged dacoity charges under IPC Section 309(4) for allegedly robbing 7-8 thousand rupees, a mobile phone, and a motorcycle from a victim on January 28, 2026, in Rupbas. The court found the nature of the offense serious, noting that loot incidents are increasing and causing fear in society. Despite the absence of prior criminal records, the court deemed bail inappropriate given the gravity of the charges and circumstances, ultimately dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Vipul Kumar's bail application filed under Section 483 CrPC on March 24, 2026. Vipul was arrested for alleged dacoity charges under IPC Section 309(4) for allegedly robbing 7-8 thousand rupees, a mobile phone, and a motorcycle from a victim on January 28, 2026, in Rupbas. The court found the nature of the offense serious, noting that loot incidents are increasing and causing fear in society. Despite the absence of prior criminal records, the court deemed bail inappropriate given the gravity of the charges and circumstances, ultimately dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case