JEETRAM AND OTHERS vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - HANSRAM GURJAR — 81/2026

Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBH070002302026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

81/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Bayana Taluka

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Cancelled

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

PS SADAR, BAYANA

Year

2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JEETRAM AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVT. Advocate - HANSRAM GURJAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of accused Jituram (age 22) and Veer Singh (age 25) under Section 483 CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement in a violent crime where they allegedly assaulted the victim's son with weapons, causing serious injuries, and unlawfully obtained ₹5,30,000, a bracelet, and jewelry. The court determined that the accused face charges under serious IPC sections (115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 324(4), 3(5)) involving dacoity and grievous hurt, making them ineligible for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Jituram (age 22) and Veer Singh (age 25) under Section 483 CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement in a violent crime where they allegedly assaulted the victim's son with weapons, causing serious injuries, and unlawfully obtained ₹5,30,000, a bracelet, and jewelry. The court determined that the accused face charges under serious IPC sections (115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 324(4), 3(5)) involving dacoity and grievous hurt, making them ineligible for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case