JEETRAM AND OTHERS vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - HANSRAM GURJAR — 81/2026
Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBH070002302026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
135/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
81/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
ADJ Bayana Taluka
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Cancelled
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
PS SADAR, BAYANA
Year
2026
Petitioner(s)
JEETRAM AND OTHERS
Respondent(s)
STATE GOVT. Advocate - HANSRAM GURJAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail application of accused Jituram (age 22) and Veer Singh (age 25) under Section 483 CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement in a violent crime where they allegedly assaulted the victim's son with weapons, causing serious injuries, and unlawfully obtained ₹5,30,000, a bracelet, and jewelry. The court determined that the accused face charges under serious IPC sections (115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 324(4), 3(5)) involving dacoity and grievous hurt, making them ineligible for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application of accused Jituram (age 22) and Veer Singh (age 25) under Section 483 CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement in a violent crime where they allegedly assaulted the victim's son with weapons, causing serious injuries, and unlawfully obtained ₹5,30,000, a bracelet, and jewelry. The court determined that the accused face charges under serious IPC sections (115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 324(4), 3(5)) involving dacoity and grievous hurt, making them ineligible for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts