HARI SINGH vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P — 79/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBH070002252026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
ADJ Bayana Taluka
Judge
2-ADJ II
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
PS GEHNOLI MOD, BAYANA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARI SINGH
Adv. RAJESH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Harisingh, Jagdish, and Dhanesh under Section 483 BNS in a dowry harassment case. The court found the allegations credible—that the accused harassed the petitioner's sister following her marriage, demanded dowry, and caused her serious injuries leading to hospitalization. Considering the grave nature of the offense and growing dowry-related crimes against women, the court deemed granting bail inappropriate at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ II
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2026
Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Harisingh, Jagdish, and Dhanesh under Section 483 BNS in a dowry harassment case. The court found the allegations credible—that the accused harassed the petitioner's sister following her marriage, demanded dowry, and caused her serious injuries leading to hospitalization. Considering the grave nature of the offense and growing dowry-related crimes against women, the court deemed granting bail inappropriate at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts