AMAR SINGH vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P — 57/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBH070001712026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
ADJ Bayana Taluka
Judge
2-ADJ II
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
330
Police Station
PS RUDAWAL
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAR SINGH
Adv. SURENDRA SINGH PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bayana (Rajasthan) granted bail to accused Amarsingh under Section 483 BNS, 2023 on March 9, 2026. The court held that since co-accused in the same case (involving charges under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 307 for an alleged violent attack) had already been granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court, the present accused was entitled to similar relief following judicial precedent, as his conduct appeared no more serious or distinct from theirs. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ II
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ II
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ II
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ II
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ II
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bayana (Rajasthan) granted bail to accused Amarsingh under Section 483 BNS, 2023 on March 9, 2026. The court held that since co-accused in the same case (involving charges under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 307 for an alleged violent attack) had already been granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court, the present accused was entitled to similar relief following judicial precedent, as his conduct appeared no more serious or distinct from theirs. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts