AMAR SINGH vs STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P — 57/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJBH070001712026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

ADJ Bayana Taluka

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

330

Police Station

PS RUDAWAL

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

AMAR SINGH

Adv. SURENDRA SINGH PARMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE GOVT. Advocate - ADDITIONAL P P

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ II

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

05-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

27-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

25-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bayana (Rajasthan) granted bail to accused Amarsingh under Section 483 BNS, 2023 on March 9, 2026. The court held that since co-accused in the same case (involving charges under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 307 for an alleged violent attack) had already been granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court, the present accused was entitled to similar relief following judicial precedent, as his conduct appeared no more serious or distinct from theirs. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bayana (Rajasthan) granted bail to accused Amarsingh under Section 483 BNS, 2023 on March 9, 2026. The court held that since co-accused in the same case (involving charges under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 379, 307 for an alleged violent attack) had already been granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court, the present accused was entitled to similar relief following judicial precedent, as his conduct appeared no more serious or distinct from theirs. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Bayana Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case