SUARAM vs RAJENDRA Advocate - SHRIRAM SHARMA — 7/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Remanded on 09th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJBH070000672018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2018
Filing Date
15-01-2018
Registration No
7/2018
Registration Date
15-01-2018
Court
ADJ Bayana Taluka
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Remanded
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUARAM
Adv. BHAGWAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRA Advocate - SHRIRAM SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Civil Appeal No. 52/2021 | Sooraml v. Rajendra | Bharatpur District Court, Rajasthan The appellate court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower court's judgment dated 08.12.2017. The core dispute concerned a disputed agreement (Exhibit 1, dated 20.07.1988) for transfer of half-share of agricultural land (Khasra No. 478). The court found that the lower court failed to properly examine critical evidence, including a settlement/reconciliation (Rajinama) dated 13.11.2017 between the appellant and certain respondents, and remanded the case for reconsideration of whether the agreement was validly executed with proper consideration and custody transfer, particularly in light of the deceased Ghanshyam's will allegedly transferring all property to respondent Mulchand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Civil Appeal No. 52/2021 | Sooraml v. Rajendra | Bharatpur District Court, Rajasthan The appellate court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower court's judgment dated 08.12.2017. The core dispute concerned a disputed agreement (Exhibit 1, dated 20.07.1988) for transfer of half-share of agricultural land (Khasra No. 478). The court found that the lower court failed to properly examine critical evidence, including a settlement/reconciliation (Rajinama) dated 13.11.2017 between the appellant and certain respondents, and remanded the case for reconsideration of whether the agreement was validly executed with proper consideration and custody transfer, particularly in light of the deceased Ghanshyam's will allegedly transferring all property to respondent Mulchand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts