LEKHRAJ vs MANEGER PICTURE PALASE BHARATPUR Advocate - RAMGOPAL — 1640/2014
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 09th March 2026.
L.c.r. - LABOUR COURT REFERENCE
CNR: RJBH060000732010
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1637/2014
Filing Date
03-08-2010
Registration No
1640/2014
Registration Date
03-08-2010
Court
LABOUR Bharatpur District HQ
Judge
1-INDUSTRIAL TRI. and LABOUR JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEKHRAJ
Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH
Respondent(s)
MANEGER PICTURE PALASE BHARATPUR Advocate - RAMGOPAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-INDUSTRIAL TRI. and LABOUR JUDGE
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 22-01-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Court of Bharatpur, Rajasthan held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the deceased worker Lekhraj and Respondent No. 1 (Picture Palace Cinema) from January 1, 1978 to November 30, 2007. The court found that the illegal termination of the worker's service without notice, proper procedure, or compliance with Industrial Disputes Act provisions (Sections 25-F and 25-J) was improper and invalid. The court awarded the worker's heirs compensation of ₹3,00,000 as lump-sum relief, plus 6% interest from the date of the award if unpaid within two months, and ₹5,000 as litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court of Bharatpur, Rajasthan held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the deceased worker Lekhraj and Respondent No. 1 (Picture Palace Cinema) from January 1, 1978 to November 30, 2007. The court found that the illegal termination of the worker's service without notice, proper procedure, or compliance with Industrial Disputes Act provisions (Sections 25-F and 25-J) was improper and invalid. The court awarded the worker's heirs compensation of ₹3,00,000 as lump-sum relief, plus 6% interest from the date of the award if unpaid within two months, and ₹5,000 as litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts