SANJYE vs NAGAR PARISHAD — 8/2017

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 529. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

L.c.r. - LABOUR COURT REFERENCE

CNR: RJBH060000462017

Filing Number

46/2017

Filing Date

06-Sep-2017

Registration No

8/2017

Registration Date

06-Sep-2017

Court

LABOUR Bharatpur District HQ

Judge

1-Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section 529

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJYE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAGAR PARISHAD

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  8. 16-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

  9. 13-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  10. 12-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  11. 25-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  12. 06-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  14. 27-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  15. 12-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

  16. 26-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  17. 24-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  18. 24-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  19. 24-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  20. 09-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  21. 27-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  22. 09-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  23. 08-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  24. 13-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  25. 22-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  26. 14-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  27. 21-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

  28. 19-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  29. 28-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  30. 21-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  31. 17-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  32. 24-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  33. 17-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  34. 13-Jan-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  35. 09-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  36. 18-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  37. 28-Oct-2022

    Restored

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  38. 28-Oct-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  39. 15-Jul-2022

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Industrial Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement but awarded compensation. The petitioner, a sanitation worker, was illegally terminated from his position with the Municipal Corporation, Gangapur City on 01-11-1997 without following proper procedures under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found the termination invalid but, considering the 17-year delay in filing the case and applicable legal precedents, directed the employer to pay the petitioner lump-sum compensation of ₹1,00,000 plus court costs of ₹5,000 within two months, with 7% annual interest if payment is delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  40. 15-Jul-2022

    Disposed

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  41. 17-Jun-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  42. 27-May-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  43. 08-Apr-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  44. 25-Mar-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  45. 25-Feb-2022

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  46. 20-Dec-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  47. 09-Nov-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  48. 06-Oct-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  49. 23-Aug-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  50. 06-Jul-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  51. 21-May-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  52. 01-Apr-2021

    Defendant Evidence

  53. 01-Mar-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  54. 13-Jan-2021

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  55. 01-Dec-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  56. 21-Oct-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  57. 11-Sep-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  58. 29-Jul-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  59. 24-Jun-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  60. 20-May-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  61. 20-Apr-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  62. 25-Feb-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  63. 03-Jan-2020

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  64. 05-Nov-2019

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  65. 04-Sep-2019

    Defendant Evidence

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  66. 21-Jun-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  67. 05-Apr-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  68. 12-Jan-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  69. 08-Dec-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  70. 16-Nov-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  71. 05-Nov-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  72. 18-Oct-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  73. 02-Aug-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  74. 11-Jun-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  75. 01-May-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  76. 07-Feb-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Industrial Tri. and Labour Judge

  77. 27-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 06-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2017

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Industrial Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement but awarded compensation. The petitioner, a sanitation worker, was illegally terminated from his position with the Municipal Corporation, Gangapur City on 01-11-1997 without following proper procedures under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found the termination invalid but, considering the 17-year delay in filing the case and applicable legal precedents, directed the employer to pay the petitioner lump-sum compensation of ₹1,00,000 plus court costs of ₹5,000 within two months, with 7% annual interest if payment is delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case