BABITA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL. PP — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 27th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBH010008642026
Filing Number
706/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bharatpur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
663
Police Station
PS SEWAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABITA
Adv. ASHISH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL. PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 172/2026 - Babita v. State of Rajasthan Babita filed a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in FIR 663/2025 involving charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. She was accused of fraudulently transferring property first sold to the complainant (for ₹15 lakh) by subsequently transferring the same property in her husband's name. The court, considering that she is a woman, has no prior criminal record, remains in judicial custody since March 18, 2026, and the investigation is ongoing, granted conditional bail requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with conditions that she cooperate in the investigation and not leave the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
-
25-Mar-2026
Orders
District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2026
Case Summary: 172/2026 - Babita v. State of Rajasthan Babita filed a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in FIR 663/2025 involving charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. She was accused of fraudulently transferring property first sold to the complainant (for ₹15 lakh) by subsequently transferring the same property in her husband's name. The court, considering that she is a woman, has no prior criminal record, remains in judicial custody since March 18, 2026, and the investigation is ongoing, granted conditional bail requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with conditions that she cooperate in the investigation and not leave the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts