BHUPENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL.P.P. — 171/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBH010008622026

Filing Number

705/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Bharatpur District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

527

Police Station

PS MATHURAGATE

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRA SINGH

    Adv. NEERAJ SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bhupendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (171/2026) The Session Court, Bharatpur granted bail to Bhupendra Singh, accused of assaulting a man and his family on 16.09.2020, causing grievous injuries with iron pipes and sticks, and robbing ₹3,500. While the prosecution argued he had absconded since 2020, the court found no prior criminal record and noted the investigation showed credible evidence against him but considered the time required for trial. The court ordered his release on bail with personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, conditional on regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhupendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (171/2026) The Session Court, Bharatpur granted bail to Bhupendra Singh, accused of assaulting a man and his family on 16.09.2020, causing grievous injuries with iron pipes and sticks, and robbing ₹3,500. While the prosecution argued he had absconded since 2020, the court found no prior criminal record and noted the investigation showed credible evidence against him but considered the time required for trial. The court ordered his release on bail with personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, conditional on regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case