BHAGWAN SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL.P.P. — 156/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBH010008032026
Filing Number
666/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Bharatpur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
PS SEWAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGWAN SINGH
Adv. GIRISH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - SPL.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 156/2026 - Bhagwan Singh v. State of Rajasthan The court granted bail to Bhagwan Singh and co-accused Deepak in an NDPS case involving 12.282 kg of cannabis allegedly recovered from their vehicle. The judge found that the investigating officer's procedure of combining all 12 packets into one bag before sealing violated proper sampling protocol, as each packet should have been sampled separately. Given the procedural irregularity, the accused's clean criminal record, and that no further recoveries remained, the court deemed bail appropriate, ordering personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2026
Case Summary: 156/2026 - Bhagwan Singh v. State of Rajasthan The court granted bail to Bhagwan Singh and co-accused Deepak in an NDPS case involving 12.282 kg of cannabis allegedly recovered from their vehicle. The judge found that the investigating officer's procedure of combining all 12 packets into one bag before sealing violated proper sampling protocol, as each packet should have been sampled separately. Given the procedural irregularity, the accused's clean criminal record, and that no further recoveries remained, the court deemed bail appropriate, ordering personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts