State vs Manohar etc. — 735/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBE060012792024

Filing Number

1278/2024

Filing Date

13-Aug-2024

Registration No

735/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

Jaitaran Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manohar etc.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    View PDF

    Case Summary: CIS No. 735/2024 Court Decision (04.05.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitarण acquitted all four accused—Manohar Ram, Balvir Chouhan, Sawai Ram, and Patel Ram—of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the alleged cargo theft from a moving truck beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions and gaps in witness testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 17-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 12-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 05-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 03-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 20-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 06-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 24-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 13-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 07-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 07-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 25-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 17-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 04-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 21-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 14-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 01-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 04-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 21-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 07-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 23-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 09-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 26-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 12-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 27-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 19-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 12-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 31-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 04-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 21-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 04-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 21-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  54. 09-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 13-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 735/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CIS No. 735/2024 Court Decision (04.05.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitarण acquitted all four accused—Manohar Ram, Balvir Chouhan, Sawai Ram, and Patel Ram—of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the alleged cargo theft from a moving truck beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions and gaps in witness testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case