State vs Manohar ram etc. Advocate - Sunil Sain — 673/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBE060011632024
Filing Number
1162/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
673/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
216
Police Station
Jaitaran Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
Manohar ram etc. Advocate - Sunil Sain
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 27-04-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 17-04-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 04-04-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 673/2024 Court Decision (04.05.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Manohar Ram, Balveer Chouhan, Sawai Ram, and Patel Ram) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the alleged theft of 12 bundles of clothes from a moving truck between Bathinda and Jaipur, determining that the circumstantial evidence was riddled with inconsistencies and the witness testimonies lacked credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 673/2024 Court Decision (04.05.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Manohar Ram, Balveer Chouhan, Sawai Ram, and Patel Ram) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the alleged theft of 12 bundles of clothes from a moving truck between Bathinda and Jaipur, determining that the circumstantial evidence was riddled with inconsistencies and the witness testimonies lacked credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts