State vs Srwan@ sudharsan Kumar Advocate - Bachna Ram Pannu — 447/2015
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,324IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: RJBE060005242015
Filing Number
729/2015
Filing Date
20-11-2015
Registration No
447/2015
Registration Date
20-11-2015
Court
ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
345
Police Station
Jaitaran Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Srwan@ sudharsan Kumar Advocate - Bachna Ram Pannu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 447/2015 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byawar District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 29 April 2026 Outcome: The accused, Shrawan @ Sudharshan Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Despite multiple witness testimonies, significant contradictions and inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination—including conflicting accounts of injuries, the nature of weapons used, and the sequence of events. Critical prosecution witnesses (including the complainant's own statement to investigating officer) contained material discrepancies that undermined the credibility of the prosecution case. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, holding that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. Orders: The accused's bail was discharged, and he was directed to furnish bonds of ₹20,000 each under CrPC Section 437 with the condition that he remain available for any appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 447/2015 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byawar District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 29 April 2026 Outcome: The accused, Shrawan @ Sudharshan Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Despite multiple witness testimonies, significant contradictions and inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination—including conflicting accounts of injuries, the nature of weapons used, and the sequence of events. Critical prosecution witnesses (including the complainant's own statement to investigating officer) contained material discrepancies that undermined the credibility of the prosecution case. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, holding that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. Orders: The accused's bail was discharged, and he was directed to furnish bonds of ₹20,000 each under CrPC Section 437 with the condition that he remain available for any appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts