State vs Srwan@ sudharsan Kumar Advocate - Bachna Ram Pannu — 447/2015

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,324IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: RJBE060005242015

Filing Number

729/2015

Filing Date

20-Nov-2015

Registration No

447/2015

Registration Date

20-Nov-2015

Court

ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

345

Police Station

Jaitaran Police Station

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,324IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Srwan@ sudharsan Kumar Advocate - Bachna Ram Pannu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: 447/2015 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byawar District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 29 April 2026 Outcome: The accused, Shrawan @ Sudharshan Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Despite multiple witness testimonies, significant contradictions and inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination—including conflicting accounts of injuries, the nature of weapons used, and the sequence of events. Critical prosecution witnesses (including the complainant's own statement to investigating officer) contained material discrepancies that undermined the credibility of the prosecution case. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, holding that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. Orders: The accused's bail was discharged, and he was directed to furnish bonds of ₹20,000 each under CrPC Section 437 with the condition that he remain available for any appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 07-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 03-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 18-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 29-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 17-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 23-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 13-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 05-Jul-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  29. 29-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  30. 01-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

  31. 30-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  32. 30-Jan-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  33. 21-Nov-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  34. 19-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  35. 06-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  36. 02-Jun-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  37. 13-Apr-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  38. 14-Mar-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  39. 09-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  40. 04-Jan-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  41. 16-Nov-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  42. 15-Oct-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  43. 17-Sep-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  44. 26-Aug-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  45. 27-Jul-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  46. 28-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  47. 28-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  48. 10-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  49. 25-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  50. 24-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  51. 21-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  52. 20-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  53. 19-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  54. 18-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  55. 17-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  56. 15-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  57. 14-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  58. 13-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  59. 12-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  60. 11-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  61. 10-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  62. 06-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  63. 15-Sep-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  64. 15-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  65. 19-Dec-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  66. 13-Jul-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  67. 09-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  68. 20-Nov-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  69. 26-Aug-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  70. 21-May-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  71. 28-Jan-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  72. 29-Oct-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  73. 06-Sep-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  74. 06-Aug-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  75. 26-Jul-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  76. 13-Jun-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  77. 17-May-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  78. 30-Apr-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  79. 15-Mar-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  80. 16-Feb-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  81. 06-Nov-2017

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  82. 15-Sep-2017

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  83. 30-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  84. 28-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  85. 13-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  86. 24-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  87. 12-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  88. 30-May-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  89. 15-May-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  90. 10-May-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  91. 10-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  92. 06-Mar-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  93. 02-Feb-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  94. 17-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  95. 16-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    Acjm

  96. 09-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Acjm

  97. 21-Oct-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  98. 22-Sep-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  99. 29-Aug-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  100. 01-Aug-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  101. 13-Jul-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  102. 02-Jun-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  103. 16-May-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  104. 21-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  105. 10-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  106. 09-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  107. 23-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  108. 10-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  109. 29-Jan-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  110. 07-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  111. 20-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 447/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 447/2015 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byawar District, Rajasthan Decision Date: 29 April 2026 Outcome: The accused, Shrawan @ Sudharshan Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapons). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Despite multiple witness testimonies, significant contradictions and inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination—including conflicting accounts of injuries, the nature of weapons used, and the sequence of events. Critical prosecution witnesses (including the complainant's own statement to investigating officer) contained material discrepancies that undermined the credibility of the prosecution case. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, holding that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. Orders: The accused's bail was discharged, and he was directed to furnish bonds of ₹20,000 each under CrPC Section 437 with the condition that he remain available for any appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case