State vs Utapal — 441/2015

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 420IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: RJBE060005132015

Filing Number

718/2015

Filing Date

01-Dec-2015

Registration No

441/2015

Registration Date

01-Dec-2015

Court

ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

432

Police Station

Jaitaran Police Station

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 420IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Utapal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    View PDF

    Summary: Case 441/2015 - State v. Utapal Decision Date: 28.03.2026 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byavur District, Rajasthan Verdict: The court acquitted both accused—Utapal Sarkar and Sujoeet Biswas—of charges under IPC Section 420 (fraud) and Modern Medical Council Act Section 15(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove illegal medical practice beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were benefited by doubt and declared not guilty; prior bail conditions were deemed satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 04-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 30-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 22-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 15-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 11-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 12-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 27-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 05-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 01-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 01-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 16-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 24-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 20-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 03-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 08-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 06-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 20-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 02-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 11-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 21-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 27-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 26-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 15-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 28-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 11-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 10-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 09-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 20-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 21-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 05-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 19-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

  54. 27-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  55. 14-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  56. 12-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  57. 30-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  58. 13-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  59. 20-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  60. 05-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  61. 27-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  62. 24-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  63. 10-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  64. 19-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  65. 23-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  66. 16-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  67. 16-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  68. 16-Dec-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  69. 08-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  70. 05-Oct-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  71. 15-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  72. 01-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  73. 16-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  74. 22-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  75. 06-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  76. 19-May-2017

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  77. 28-Apr-2017

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  78. 28-Mar-2017

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  79. 17-Feb-2017

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  80. 23-Jan-2017

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  81. 23-Dec-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  82. 17-Nov-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  83. 17-Oct-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  84. 24-Sep-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  85. 16-Aug-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  86. 26-Jul-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  87. 12-Jul-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  88. 23-Jun-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  89. 21-May-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  90. 07-May-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  91. 28-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  92. 06-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  93. 19-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  94. 27-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  95. 10-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Order

    Acjm

  96. 14-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  97. 01-Dec-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 441/2015 - State v. Utapal Decision Date: 28.03.2026 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaitaran, Byavur District, Rajasthan Verdict: The court acquitted both accused—Utapal Sarkar and Sujoeet Biswas—of charges under IPC Section 420 (fraud) and Modern Medical Council Act Section 15(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove illegal medical practice beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were benefited by doubt and declared not guilty; prior bail conditions were deemed satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case