Rajkumar vs Budha ram @ Budmal — 52/2015

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: RJBE060004602015

Filing Number

664/2015

Filing Date

18-Jun-2015

Registration No

52/2015

Registration Date

18-Jun-2015

Court

ACJM JM- Jaitaran Taluka Court

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar

    Adv. SKC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Budha ram @ Budmal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: Rajkumar v. Budha Ram (Case 52/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Budha Ram @ Budmal of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (cheque dishonor offense). The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused deliberately issued a cheque knowing it would bounce, as multiple material facts surrounding the loan transaction, cheque issuance, and parties' relationship remained doubtful and unestablished by the petitioner's testimony. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioner failed to credibly prove the essential facts of the case—including the loan purpose, payment circumstances, the cheque holder's identity, and the parties' relationship—with significant inconsistencies in witness statements. The accused raised probable defense by disputing that the cheque was issued as security for a commercial transaction rather than a personal loan. Given these substantial doubts, the conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  17. 01-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  18. 29-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  20. 06-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  21. 04-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  22. 01-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  23. 13-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  24. 29-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  25. 06-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  26. 28-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  27. 25-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  28. 18-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  29. 08-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  30. 01-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  31. 29-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  32. 19-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  33. 14-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  34. 30-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  35. 16-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  36. 02-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  37. 05-May-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  38. 08-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  39. 18-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  40. 05-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  41. 12-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  42. 11-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  43. 21-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  44. 06-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  45. 01-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  46. 27-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  47. 05-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  48. 16-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  49. 06-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  50. 19-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  51. 29-May-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  52. 09-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  53. 12-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  54. 29-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  55. 14-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  56. 10-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  57. 08-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  58. 28-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  59. 29-May-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  60. 12-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  61. 30-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  62. 11-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  63. 14-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  64. 19-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  65. 27-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  66. 10-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  67. 07-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  68. 22-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  69. 14-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  70. 23-May-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  71. 13-May-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  72. 28-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  73. 12-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  74. 26-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  75. 25-Jun-2021

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  76. 09-Feb-2021

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  77. 22-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  78. 16-Jul-2020

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  79. 16-Apr-2020

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  80. 24-Feb-2020

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  81. 19-Dec-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  82. 30-Sep-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  83. 23-Jul-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  84. 29-May-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  85. 29-Mar-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  86. 29-Jan-2019

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  87. 27-Nov-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Jm

  88. 05-Oct-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  89. 24-Aug-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  90. 10-Jul-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  91. 18-Jun-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  92. 15-May-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  93. 03-May-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  94. 06-Feb-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  95. 09-Jan-2018

    Awaiting Order from Higher Court

    Acjm

  96. 25-Sep-2017

    —

    Acjm

  97. 15-Sep-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  98. 17-Jun-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  99. 17-May-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  100. 18-Apr-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  101. 09-Mar-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  102. 25-Jan-2017

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  103. 22-Dec-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  104. 18-Nov-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  105. 08-Nov-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  106. 03-Oct-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  107. 02-Sep-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  108. 16-Aug-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  109. 05-Aug-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  110. 22-Jul-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  111. 24-May-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  112. 11-May-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  113. 26-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  114. 18-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  115. 12-Apr-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  116. 30-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  117. 17-Mar-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  118. 24-Feb-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  119. 21-Jan-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  120. 13-Jan-2016

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  121. 16-Dec-2015

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  122. 07-Nov-2015

    Awaiting Record

    Acjm

  123. 15-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  124. 18-Jun-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajkumar v. Budha Ram (Case 52/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Budha Ram @ Budmal of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (cheque dishonor offense). The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused deliberately issued a cheque knowing it would bounce, as multiple material facts surrounding the loan transaction, cheque issuance, and parties' relationship remained doubtful and unestablished by the petitioner's testimony. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioner failed to credibly prove the essential facts of the case—including the loan purpose, payment circumstances, the cheque holder's identity, and the parties' relationship—with significant inconsistencies in witness statements. The accused raised probable defense by disputing that the cheque was issued as security for a commercial transaction rather than a personal loan. Given these substantial doubts, the conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case