Bhawani singh etc vs Deepak Singh — 20/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 80(2). Status: Reply of Application/ Steps by parties. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBE050006912021
Filing Number
240/2021
Filing Date
26-Aug-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
26-Aug-2021
Court
ADJ-Jaitaran Taluka Court
Judge
1-ADJ
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhawani singh etc
Adv. D.S.R
-
2.Vikalkishor
-
3.Jagpal Singh
-
4.Sunita
-
5.Vinod Kanwar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepak Singh
-
2.Himmat singh
-
3.Kishan Kanwar
-
4.Sunil Kumar
-
5.Manaram
-
6.Bajarang Singh
-
7.Up Panjiyan
-
8.Teshildar
-
9.R. Inspector
-
10.Patwari
-
11.Rajasthan State jiladish
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
05-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
13-Oct-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
14-Jul-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
17-Mar-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
13-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
03-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
18-Nov-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
05-Oct-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
20-Jul-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
18-May-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
22-Apr-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
26-Feb-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
17-Feb-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
03-Feb-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
20-Jan-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
20-Nov-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
21-Oct-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
16-Sep-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
19-Aug-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
15-Jul-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
15-Apr-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
27-Feb-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
16-Jan-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
09-Jan-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
19-Dec-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
21-Nov-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
15-Oct-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
19-Sep-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
16-Jul-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
21-May-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
25-Apr-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
14-Feb-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ
-
21-Jan-2022
Case Summary: 20/2021 The petitioners' petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and sections 207, 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected and dismissed on 21.01.2022. The court found the petition maintainable only before the Revenue Court, not the civil court, as it concerns agricultural land ownership rights and declarations of land possession. The court held that the petition was time-barred (filed 45 years after relevant 1972 documents), the petitioners lacked standing, and sale deeds executed in 2021 based on invalid earlier registrations should be challenged through proper revenue proceedings, not the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2022
Orders
ADJ
-
18-Jan-2022
Orders
ADJ
-
15-Jan-2022
Orders
ADJ
-
04-Jan-2022
Orders
ADJ
-
20-Dec-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
16-Dec-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
30-Oct-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
20-Oct-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
06-Oct-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
23-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
14-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
13-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2021
Case Summary: 20/2021 The petitioners' petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and sections 207, 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected and dismissed on 21.01.2022. The court found the petition maintainable only before the Revenue Court, not the civil court, as it concerns agricultural land ownership rights and declarations of land possession. The court held that the petition was time-barred (filed 45 years after relevant 1972 documents), the petitioners lacked standing, and sale deeds executed in 2021 based on invalid earlier registrations should be challenged through proper revenue proceedings, not the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts