Bhawani singh etc vs Deepak Singh — 20/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 80(2). Status: Reply of Application/ Steps by parties. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBE050006912021
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
240/2021
Filing Date
26-08-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
26-08-2021
Court
ADJ-Jaitaran Taluka Court
Judge
1-ADJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhawani singh etc
Adv. D.S.R
Vikalkishor
Jagpal Singh
Sunita
Vinod Kanwar
Respondent(s)
Deepak Singh
Himmat singh
Kishan Kanwar
Sunil Kumar
Manaram
Bajarang Singh
Up Panjiyan
Teshildar
R. Inspector
Patwari
Rajasthan State jiladish
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 05-01-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 13-10-2025 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 14-07-2025 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 17-03-2025 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 20/2021 The petitioners' petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and sections 207, 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected and dismissed on 21.01.2022. The court found the petition maintainable only before the Revenue Court, not the civil court, as it concerns agricultural land ownership rights and declarations of land possession. The court held that the petition was time-barred (filed 45 years after relevant 1972 documents), the petitioners lacked standing, and sale deeds executed in 2021 based on invalid earlier registrations should be challenged through proper revenue proceedings, not the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 20/2021 The petitioners' petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and sections 207, 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected and dismissed on 21.01.2022. The court found the petition maintainable only before the Revenue Court, not the civil court, as it concerns agricultural land ownership rights and declarations of land possession. The court held that the petition was time-barred (filed 45 years after relevant 1972 documents), the petitioners lacked standing, and sale deeds executed in 2021 based on invalid earlier registrations should be challenged through proper revenue proceedings, not the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts