Hardev etc. vs Hajariram etc. Advocate - Suresh Choudhary — 174/2014
Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJBE050000452011
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
148/2014
Filing Date
26-09-2011
Registration No
174/2014
Registration Date
26-09-2011
Court
ADJ-Jaitaran Taluka Court
Judge
1-ADJ
Petitioner(s)
Hardev etc.
Adv. Dungarsingh Rathore
Respondent(s)
Hajariram etc. Advocate - Suresh Choudhary
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Restored
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 20-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-05-2026 | Restored |
| 19-05-2026 | Disposed |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 174/2014 Outcome: The petition filed by respondent no. 3 (Budha Khan) seeking to invalidate certain sale deeds and obtain a permanent injunction under Section 151 CPC and Sections 207, 256 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1955 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court found that the petitioner lacked the legal standing to file such a petition, as the disputed agricultural land pertains to ancestral joint family property that devolved upon the defendant no. 1 (Hajariram) from birth under Hindu succession law. The court held that the petitioner's remedy, if any, lay exclusively with the Revenue Court, not the civil court, for matters involving khatedari rights regarding state land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 174/2014 Outcome: The petition filed by respondent no. 3 (Budha Khan) seeking to invalidate certain sale deeds and obtain a permanent injunction under Section 151 CPC and Sections 207, 256 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1955 has been DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court found that the petitioner lacked the legal standing to file such a petition, as the disputed agricultural land pertains to ancestral joint family property that devolved upon the defendant no. 1 (Hajariram) from birth under Hindu succession law. The court held that the petitioner's remedy, if any, lay exclusively with the Revenue Court, not the civil court, for matters involving khatedari rights regarding state land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts